Quantitative Content Method For Business - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Quantitative Content Method For Business? Answer: Introducation Cross-cultural communication results in conglomeration of different cultures. Cross-cultural communication results in the sharing of preconceived knowledge from one employee to the other. This knowledge transfer enriches the knowledge, skills and capabilities of the employees. Moreover, cross-cultural communication brings unity within the employees, leading to the exposure of collaborative output (Padhi, 2016). These are the positive aspects related to cross-cultural communication. Viewing the aspect from the negative connotation, cross-cultural communication results in difference of opinions. Herein lays the appropriateness of the true meaning of cross. This differentiation gives rise to conflicts, harassments and discriminations breaking the unity. These conflicts compel the companies and organizations to encounter negative results in terms of the identified goals and objectives. The major drive behind this is lack of adequate understanding about the regulation of the employees per formance. This lack compels the managers to face instances employee turnover, which is an utter loss (Padhi, 2016). Preference of power during communication creates a negative impact on the employees about the managers. This type of impression is an obstacle towards extracting productive work from the employees. This aspect brings behavior into the discussion. Exposure of professional attitude acts as an opportunity for the employees to become their boss favorite. Cross-cultural communication: An ethical issue In a company or organization, employees belong to different socio-cultural background. If a company or organization organizes group discussions, it proves beneficial in terms of enhancing cultural diversity within the workplace. For example, while surveying the employees, if the questions are personal, it tends to hurt the individual sentiments of the employees. Along with this, if most of the questions are religious, it is an attempt to degrade the sanctity and purity of their culture (Padhi, 2016). If the company or organization imposes restrictions on the dress code of the employees, it is also an attempt to intervene into their culture, customs and traditions. Here, achievement of adequate understanding of ethical consideration is a crucial aspect. If a professor has this understanding, he would be able to indulge in effective communication with the students and professors from other culture. For this, the professor needs to mix with the professors and students equally. This need s patience, even if the professors and students expose differentiation in their communication. Along with this, if the professor has adequate knowledge regarding the mindset of the students and professors from other cultures, it would be easier for him to communicate without any misunderstandings and misinterpretations (Padhi, 2016). Necessity of internal communication capacity Recent economic challenges refer to the competitive rivalry, which aggravates the complexities of the companies and organizations to sustain their position in the competitive ambience. In order to sustain the position, the companies and organizations need to develop communication capacity. Organizing lecture and seminars on diverse topics enables the personnel to become aware of the fluency of the employees in their linguistic skills. This assessment is crucial in terms of controlling the external threats. Here, rational approach is necessary for the managers in terms of regulating the employees linguistic performance (Padhi, 2016). External threat can be related with the aspect of threat of substitutes, intensifying the rivalry between the brands to grab the power. The statement highlights the contrast between the internal and external environment of the companies and organizations. Communication acts as a medium in terms of maintaining the balance between the two environments. Fluency in English helps the employees to communicate with the foreign clients, creating a positive image in the minds of the managers. However, rationality in this direction would help the companies and organization to lure the foreign investors. Emerging successful in this context, results in professional and personal development of the employees. The word further reflects continuity to the challenge, which the companies and organizations face in terms of globalizing their business (Padhi, 2016). The need for communication capacity can be considered as an answer to these challenges, if dealt rationally and consciously. True essence of cultural proficiency This statement, opined by Genevieve Hilton, highlights the true essence of the aspect, cultural proficiency. As a matter of specification, proficiency about different cultures enhances the perspectives of the personnel. However, this knowledge goes in vain if the personnel lack the understanding about the proper and judicious utilization of this proficiency. Listening to the tales of the other contemporary brands, acts as a lesson for the companies and organization, in terms of executing the marketing activities efficiently and effectively (Padhi, 2016). Asking for help can be considered as the urge of the personnel regarding the provision of proper guidance about the current communication skills, abilities and capabilities. Placing the action of speaking in last position reflects an oriental approach. This is in terms of evaluation prior to voicing out the opinions. Therefore, in order to achieve proficiency in communication skills, the personnel need to first listen, then ask for g uidance. When they feel confident about the knowledge they have gained, they can speak out. Maintaining this sequence is flexible enough for producing positive results in enhancing business communication (Padhi, 2016). Help here can be related with attending spoken English classes for achieving fluency in the current communication skills and abilities. Effectiveness of focus on individual differences than promotion of cultural adaptation Focusing on the individual differences makes the individual aware of their weakness, for which they lack from the others. Herein lays the appropriateness of the exercise of self-assessment. Rationality in this assessment helps the individuals in assessing their position amidst the other cultures. This rationality, in turn, helps in enhancing the preconceived creativity within the individuals. Training is crucial for the individuals in terms of exposing rational approach towards refinement of the linguistic skills, abilities and capabilities. Along with this, training would make the individuals aware of the dynamics of the other cultures (Padhi, 2016). This knowledge helps the individuals in communication with the people from other socio-cultural backgrounds, maintaining the sanctity and purity of their cultures. Herein lays the appropriateness of the aspect, intercultural communication. Individual approach is preferred more in terms of modifying the self-weakness before adopting or m ingling with the other cultures. On the contrary, attempting cross-cultural communication without proper knowledge of the other cultures would result in negative outcomes. This negativity contradicts the aspect of innovation, nullifying the hope of refinement in the current communication skills, abilities and capabilities of the individuals (Padhi, 2016). Making effective use of the learnt skills to communicate with the personnel of the other socio-cultural backgrounds, results in personal development, leading towards professional development. Competitive advantage for companies successful in cross-cultural communication It is true that companies, which emerge successful in cross-cultural communication, have a greater competitive edge. This is because these companies practice time management while executing the business activities. Most of the time is spent by the personnel on constructing plans for enhancing efficiency in the business activities. These plans do not include modification of the internal and external communication skills and abilities. Focus on the management of the organizational resources helps these companies to provide quality products to the customers (Padhi, 2016). Maintenance of consistency in seeking innovative ways and means for producing the products acts assistance for the personnel in terms of adding to the stock of customers. On the other hand, the companies spending quality time in training the employees on effect communication are much closer towards penetrating into the foreign markets. This is because polishing the preconceived communication skills of the employees results in the transformation of the personality of the employees. Providing opportunity to the employees to speak in the presentations provides them a platform for exercising their communication skills and abilities. Along with this, organizing question answer sessions after seminars and lectures enhances the competency and capability of the employees to indulge in effective communication with the employees of the other cultures (Padhi, 2016). Therefore, the statement can be contradicted, as the companies with training on communication are bound to achieve greater competitive edge than those who focus just on the resources. This negation highlights the fact that attracting the foreign investors with fluent English conversation possesses direct relationship with the achievement of greater competitive edge. Communication styles of India and Australia In India, my home country, people communicate in diversified languages. Here, people belong to different socio-cultural backgrounds. The different communication styles followed by the people here are verbal and written. In verbal communication style, sign language, gestures and symbols are used for communicating with the people with speech and hearing impairment (Padhi, 2016). There are various healthcare centres, which play an effective role in enhancing the communication skills and abilities of these specially challenged people. Typical examples of written communication are letters, emails. Advancement of science has modified the means of communication- mobile language, such as SMS. This is also the case with Australia. Here also, there are people from diversified socio=-cultural backgrounds. The communication style of Australians is informal, which reflects an urge to mix with the people of other cultures willingly. Handshake is a common feature in Australian communication. One of an important aspect in Australian communication is the respect, which they show towards the other cultures. The use of slangs is confusing; however, the intention is not to degrade the purity and sanctity of the other cultures (Padhi, 2016). Therefore, it can be said that the communication styles of both India and Australia are similar- verbal and written. Only difference lies in the approach towards practicing the communication styles. This does not mean that there are no healthcare centers for curing the impairment of the people with speech and hearing impairment. The healthcare centres in Australia are much more advances as they possess latest and modern technologies for curing the impairments of the people regarding communication. Negative impact of communicational differences on business Recently, it has been identified that one of the companies is undergoing through the phase of difference in the opinion of the employees regarding group discussion. The intensity of the difference has crossed all the limits (Padhi, 2016). The managers intervened into the issue, but failed to manage the employees. At one extent, this difference in opinion injured one of the employees. This incident made the managers feel the need for involving the law officials into the business issues. The law officials went through the CCTV camera clippings, which was a surprise to them. The managers were giving training to the employees regarding the basic management skills. At one point, one employee asked a question to the manager and he replied. However, another employee opposed the answer of the manager. This difference of opinion resulted in a fight between the employee and the manager (Padhi, 2016). Differences in opinion are common in the workplace. However, the managers need to be flexible enough in terms of handling these issues efficiently and effectively. If the manager is injured, he is incapable of this management. This type of differences attaches a negative connotation to the aspect of cross-cultural communication. This negativity is an obstacle towards the efficient execution of business activities, stalling the productivity. Impact of stereotypical notions on communication The word obsession does not go with the business. This is because the personnel need to adjust with the workplace environment. Overemphasizing the differences can be considered as a wastage of time, which if utilized in modifying the drawbacks would enable the personnel to complete the tasks within the deadline (Padhi, 2016). This overemphasizing is an affirmation towards the stereotypical notions, which are created by the people for abiding by their culture and traditions. Sticking to this stereotypical notions aggravate the complexities in terms of communicating with the people from the other cultures. Countering this, stereotypical notions about ones culture are solely personal. Interference to this notion is against the ethics. However, being obsessive about the cultural values is difficult in terms of enriching the knowledge about the other cultures. Viewing it from the other perspective, nothing is stereotypical in business other than the cultural values. This is in terms of the innovation, which is bound to arrive in the workplace, because of the rational approach of the employees (Padhi, 2016). Delving deep into this aspect, this innovation is hard to achieve if the managers are obsessive and overemphasize the cultural differences of the employees. Moreover, overemphasizing the differences also becomes difficult in terms of enhancing the cultural diversity in the workplace. Accuracy of stereotypical perceptions between India and Australia Every person possesses certain stereotypical notions about others. These notions are about their culture, tradition, customs and values. Australians think that they are very well acquainted with the culture of India. Along with this, they also think that the people of India can be questioned and challenged on various topics. This is because the Australians think that Indian culture is very diversified. On the contrary, first sight of Australians make the Indians feel that they are very hi-fi people with latest and modern technologies (Padhi, 2016). Indians prefer Australia for pursuing higher education from the prestigious universities. When Australians visit the India, they greet the people by saying Namaste. This indicates the respect, which the Australians pay to the culture, customs and traditions of India. These notions can be considered as accurate in terms of enriching knowledge regarding the other cultures. However, in terms of communication, preference to these notions hinders the aspect of cross-cultural communication. Over-emphasizing these stereotypical notions tends to produce negative results in terms of execution of the business activities. Viewing it from the other perspective, stereotypical notions about other cultures act as an obstacle in mixing with the people. This hindrance aggravates the complexities in terms of organizing group discussions between the employees (Padhi, 2016). References Alberts, J. K., Nakayama, T. K., Martin, J. N. (2015).Human communication in society. Pearson. Berger, B. K., Meng, J. (Eds.). (2014).Public relations leaders as sensemakers: A global study of leadership in public relations and communication management. Routledge. Christensen, L. T., Cheney, G. (2014). Peering into transparency: Challenging ideals, proxies, and organizational practices.Communication Theory,25(1), 70-90. Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016).Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J. (2015).Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Hartman, L. P., DesJardins, J. R., MacDonald, C. (2014).Business ethics: Decision making for personal integrity and social responsibility. New York: McGraw-Hill. Lipschultz, J. H. (2017).Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. Taylor Francis. Lock, I., Seele, P. (2015). Quantitative content analysis as a method for business ethics research.Business Ethics: A European Review,24(S1). Maniora, J. (2017). Is integrated reporting really the superior mechanism for the integration of ethics into the core business model? An empirical analysis.Journal of Business Ethics,140(4), 755-786. Padhi, P. K. (2016).The Rising Importance of Cross Cultural Communication in Global Business Scenario. Journals of Research in Humanities and social science. 4(1), pp 20-26 Paquette, M., Sommerfeldt, E. J., Kent, M. L. (2015). Do the ends justify the means? Dialogue, development communication, and deontological ethics.Public Relations Review,41(1), 30-39. Rendtorff, J. D. (Ed.). (2016).Power and principle in the market place: On ethics and economics. Routledge. Shanahan, F., Seele, P. (2015). Shorting Ethos: exploring the relationship between Aristotles Ethos and Reputation Management.Corporate Reputation Review,18(1), 37-49. Terec-Vlad, L., Trifu, A., Terec-Vlad, D. (2015). The decisional moment and ethics.Ecoforum Journal,4(1), 11. Trevino, L. K., Nelson, K. A. (2016).Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. John Wiley Sons.